Josh Berkus writes ("Re: SPI and the case of dissolution"):
> I don't think that case was anticipated, at least I can't find it in
> the bylaws. Maybe someone who's been here from the beginning (Ian?
> Joey?) could enlighten me. In my experience, when NP
I also meant to send this to the list, Thursday morning. MJ
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark R Dobyns Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 25, 2006 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: SPI and the case of dissolution
To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 10/25/06, mar
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:40:21AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I wonder how SPI handles the case of dissolution; if the entire
> organisation became incapacitated, what happens to the trademarks?
> Or how do you guard against the dissolution?
The rules in case of dissolution are explained in o
Thanks for the responses!
also sprach Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.10.25.1752 +0200]:
> The Associated Project resolution does say that assets are "in
> trust" for the various organziations. This would imply that we
> are required to consult with each OSS project on what to do with
> th
Martin,
> I wonder how SPI handles the case of dissolution; if the entire
> organisation became incapacitated, what happens to the trademarks?
> Or how do you guard against the dissolution?
I don't think that case was anticipated, at least I can't find it in the
bylaws. Maybe someone who's bee
Hi,
I wonder how SPI handles the case of dissolution; if the entire
organisation became incapacitated, what happens to the trademarks?
Or how do you guard against the dissolution?
I am sorry if this is blunt, but I could not figure it out from the
bylaws and I am new in this area and trying to ma
