Hi folks
I realize that we didn’t make it to the Oct 12 agenda - our members are
wondering if you believe this will get on the Nov meeting?
Thanks
Ralph
> On Oct 10, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * Joshua D. Drake [2016-10-10 11:10]:
>>> We depend on the members to raise iss
Thank you! Look forward to working with you folks!
Ralph
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * r...@open-mpi.org [2016-10-25 09:27]:
>> I realize that we didn’t make it to the Oct 12 agenda - our members are
>> wondering if you believe this will get on the Nov meeting?
>
* r...@open-mpi.org [2016-10-25 09:27]:
> I realize that we didn’t make it to the Oct 12 agenda - our members are
> wondering if you believe this will get on the Nov meeting?
I haven't seen any objections, so I would expect we vote on it in
November.
I can add it to the agenda.
--
Martin Mich
* Joshua D. Drake [2016-10-10 11:10]:
> >We depend on the members to raise issues around legal
> >entanglements, traps and other "unknown unknowns" with new
> >projects. Giving members less than a day's notice is in no way
> >adequate for this.
>
> OpenMPI has been in discussions with the board
On 10/10/2016 11:10 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 06:54 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
>> On 10/09/2016 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At
>>> that point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes
>>> defun
On 10/09/2016 06:54 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
On 10/09/2016 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At
that point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes
defunct was requested. I am not expecting for Open MPI to become d
On 10/09/2016 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At
> that point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes
> defunct was requested. I am not expecting for Open MPI to become defunct
> anytime soon, this is mostly gu
This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At that
point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes defunct was
requested. I am not expecting for Open MPI to become defunct anytime soon,
this is mostly guidance for the future SPI board. It is similar in spirit
ho
