Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

2016-05-10 Thread Mark Atwood
On Tue, May 10, 2016, at 14:13, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > I would like to see something like the following added to the resolution: > > 6. In the event that the NTPsec project dissolves without defining what >SPI shall do with the managed assets or the NTPsec project becomes >provable un

Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Tue May 10, 2016 at 23:13:47 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu May 05, 2016 at 16:20:13 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > > Please add this resolution to our May agenda. > > > > NTPsec is a secure, hardened, and improved implementation of Network Time > > Protocol derived fro

Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

2016-05-10 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Thu May 05, 2016 at 16:20:13 -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Please add this resolution to our May agenda. > > NTPsec is a secure, hardened, and improved implementation of Network Time > Protocol derived from NTP Classic, Dave Mills’s original. > > The project has a website with community a

Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

2016-05-06 Thread Bdale Garbee
Martin Michlmayr writes: > I haven't seen any conversation with the board about what they need, > what they are looking for, etc. > > I don't know how I should vote on a resolution without any prior > conversation at all. > > Why hasn't Mark been in contact with the board? He talked to me. The

Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project

2016-05-05 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I haven't seen any conversation with the board about what they need, what they are looking for, etc. I don't know how I should vote on a resolution without any prior conversation at all. Why hasn't Mark been in contact with the board? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ _