* Joshua D. Drake [2016-10-10 11:10]:
> >We depend on the members to raise issues around legal
> >entanglements, traps and other "unknown unknowns" with new
> >projects. Giving members less than a day's notice is in no way
> >adequate for this.
>
> OpenMPI has been in discussions with the board
On 10/10/2016 11:10 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 10/09/2016 06:54 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
>> On 10/09/2016 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At
>>> that point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes
>>> defun
On 10/09/2016 06:54 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
On 10/09/2016 11:45 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
This was meant to go into September meeting (originally proposed). At
that point, a clause suggesting what to do if the project becomes
defunct was requested. I am not expecting for Open MPI to become d
On 10/10/2016 01:57 AM, Peter Cock wrote:
Anything that is confidential. For example, a potential legal issue.
Why would a potential legal issue be confidential?
I would have thought legal issues should be private by default.
e.g. Project X has noticed company Y appears to be using their
sof
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> On 2016-10-08 15:42, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> On 10/08/2016 09:38 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Martin,
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thank you
spi-board is a list of the board of directors to communicate. It's
also used a
