Re: proposed replacement bylaws

2016-07-06 Thread David Graham
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 07/04/2016 08:52 AM, David Graham wrote: >> *Article 3, Section 8: Quorum >> * >> "Members entitled to cast a majority of the total number of votes >> entitled to be cast thereat shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of >> members for th

Re: proposed replacement bylaws

2016-07-06 Thread Ian Jackson
Dimitri John Ledkov writes ("Re: proposed replacement bylaws"): > Given that directors in general hold the office for 3 year terms & > that initial director terms are staggered - the staggered terms follow > perpetually. This has actually been the case already, and I don't > believe we actually req

Re: proposed replacement bylaws

2016-07-06 Thread Ian Jackson
Joshua D. Drake writes ("Re: proposed replacement bylaws"): > Agreed. Also, I am not sure I like that 10% but I am not sure of a > better solution. If the contributing membership is 100, 10% is too easy. > If it is 1000, then it is probably reasonable, if it is 10,000 then we > have a real probl