On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:51:44AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Given that SPI will just continue to add affiliates over time, I
> personally think that allowing *any* organization to have more than one
> authoritative liaison is a mistake. It doesn't scale for the number of
> projects SPI needs
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:09:52AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Well as it stands I think the resolution is flawed. We can not have more
> than one liaison. It needs to be reworded in a way that the liaison has
> delegation authority or something if they want a backup, but a "pair" of
> equals i
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 10:51 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jimmy,
> Given that SPI will just continue to add affiliates over time, I
> personally think that allowing *any* organization to have more than one
> authoritative liaison is a mistake. It doesn't scale for the number of
> projects SPI ne
Jimmy,
> It's certainly not a perfect solution, but they seem to want more than one
> liaison, possibly for cases where one of them is unavailable. In any case, to
> whatever extent it's flawed, I think it's still sufficiently workable to
> approve today, and then tweak later if a better solution
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 04:51:17PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Well, for prior organizations we haven't allowed having more than one
> liaison for *any* organization to avoid confusion. Why would OpenWRT be
> different? One of the two needs to be the main liaison, and the other
> an alternate.
Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated
project [revised]"):
> For example, if a liason is acting contrary to the wishes of a
> project, and the project reports that this is the case to SPI and
> removes the liason, but the liason reports that it is not the
Josh Berkus writes;
> Actually, that's not what I'm personally worried about. What I'm
> worried about is:
These are the right questions, I think. Given what I'm about to say
I've changed the names to Alice and Bob of the FreePLNK project, to
make it clearly hypothetical.
> -- If Alice says "P
