Re: [SAtalk] CHARSET_FARAWAY_BODY test

On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 12:26:54PM +1100, Justin Mason wrote: > yep. I've set it up to allow all "windows" charsets (argh). Is that the proper behavior? Some windows- charsets are definately "foreign" (at least to us silly monolingual americans). mike -- mike

[SAtalk] false positives

ool though. 2) And, for when false positives do occur, has anyone yet hacked up a mutt macro for running the message through spamassassin -d and moving the message to another folder? Thanks, mike -- mike castleman / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://mlcastle.net / (646) 382-7220 current location

Re: [SAtalk] where's the F{ine}M regarding ok_locales?

foreign charset" and a "message is in big5 in particular" test, > since the main body of spam it needs to catch seems to be in the latter. > > (I haven't seen a koi8-r or tis620 spam yet, as far as I know). -- mike castleman / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://mlcastle.net / (646)

Re: [SAtalk] false positives

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 12:44:10AM -0500, mike castleman wrote: > 2) And, for when false positives do occur, has anyone yet hacked up a >mutt macro for running the message through spamassassin -d and >moving the message to another folder? So, there might be some prettier way, b