Is there someway that I can edit the subject line to get the SA score in
there? I am using SA 2.55 and procmail.
TIA
jpf
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
FYI: I got a notice this morning that my subscription was cancelled to
something...below is what the list admin sent me back...perhaps OSIRUSOFT
related...I have pointed him to appropriate resources regarding the
matter...
> > JPF, looks like our bounce parser has picked up 3 bounce messag
Any help sketching this out would be appreciated...
TIA,
jpf
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
I can pick only
certain users as some replies have been one-off's.
Seems to work pretty well.
jpf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> I have had great success with a home-grown anti-spam system using
>
> - sendmail
> - some RBLs
very rarely will it get killed the second time thru, HTH, jpf
#-begin .procmail snippet
:0fw spamassassin.lock
| /usr/home/USER/sausr/bin/spamassassin -a
:0fw spamassassin.lock
* !^X-Spam-Status
| /usr/home/USER/sausr/bin/spamassassin -a
#-- end .procmail snippet
"Andreas Kotowic
I rec'd the following mail...It had only run 1 test and rec'd a score of
only 0.1...any ideas why?
thanks,
jpf
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Receiv
and this one got a score of 0.0!!
i have the procmail log file available for the first one...but nothing looks
abnormal there...
i'm stumped...especially since they are formatted similarly...
==
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apologies for the bandwidth, I suppose a few FP's are better than all the
noise..I was most concerning with an aborted run of some sort.
Thanks,
jpf
"jpf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and this one got a score of 0.0!!
>
> i have the procm
