[SAtalk] Speed

Hello everybody, I'm new to the list so please excuse me if this topic was beaten to death... I'm very impressed with spam assassin acuracy in spam detection, however it is not as fast as I wish it was (which is very much understandable given that spamassassin is written in perl and uses huge nu

[SAtalk] Alt spam scanning products

Hello, Has anybody used Postini (postini.com) spam scanning software? I'm getting pressured from my management to evaluate postini (as a potential replacement to SA), and would like to hear from people who might have used this software... -- Eugene Miretskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> INVISION.COM,

[SAtalk] Comparisson with other spam scanners

Can anybody point me to a solid (third party, scientific, lots of data analyzed, etc) study compairing SA with other software (both open source and comercial)? -- Eugene Miretskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> INVISION.COM, INC. (631) 543-1000 www.invision.net / www.longisland.com pgp0.p

Re: [SAtalk] adding SPAM hits score to headers

On [10/17/03 09:54], Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Diego Puppin Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 8:55 AM > > > is it possible to add the spamassassin "hits" score to the spam mails, > > so that I can sort my spam box and find the "spammest" emails? > > Yep, it's in the Docs at: > http://au.spamassassi

Re: [SAtalk] Looking for some interview subjects

On [10/21/03 17:56], Chris Paul wrote: > You should call me. I'm starting a company that will eliminate spam for good. > Not just filter it. Filtration won't scale. We'll be eliminating spam for good. The company is just being started, but already has some marketing pitches :) Good luck :) > >

[SAtalk] spamd logging patch

Hello, I wanted to have spamd print logging messages on stderr (or stdout) so that I could use multilog program for logging instead of syslog. Attached is a patch to do just that. --- /usr/local/bin/spamdMon Jul 8 14:56:42 2002 +++ spamd Mon Jul 8 15:53:35 2002 @@ -19,6 +19,7 @

[SAtalk] spam rules

Attached spam message scored only 2.31 with pretty much default installation (spamd running with -L switch). None of the unsubscribe/lame excuse rules triggered. I think the following changes should be made: body EXCUSE_1 /\b(?:You (?:were sent|have received|are receiving

[SAtalk] porn rules

None of the porn rules fired on this message: From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 20 03:33:17 2002 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 25884 invoked by uid 152); 20 Jul 2002 07:33:17 - Received: from alder.invision.net (206.112.34.75) by antares.invi

Re: [SAtalk] Probably trivial & unimportant but driving me crazy

Modify /var/spool/qmail-scanner/qmail-scanner-queue-version.txt On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 08:30:41AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here's my relevant system info > freebsd-4.7 RC#0/qmail 1.03+ldap patch /ezmlm0.53+idx patch > qmail-scanner modification 1.14/spamassassin 2.42 (upgraded from 2.4

[SAtalk] hit-frequencies output question

This is a header output of hit-frequencies program in masses dir: OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME 4451 1900 25510.427 0.000.00 (all messages) 100.000 42.6870 57.31300.427 0.000.00 (all messages as %) What should I look for to determine wh

[SAtalk] Bayes expiry

Hello, sa-learn stopped learning messages. Debugging shows that it can successfully tie Bayes db, extracts tokens, etc, but never actually writes data to the database. I had a db corruption issue some time ago, so, this could very well be remnants of that. Anyway, I'm trying to run "sa-learn -