[SAtalk] Why tagged as spam when HITS < REQUIRED ??

2003-09-03 Thread Steve Brorens
On my experimantal 'gateway' configuration (Postfix/Amavisd-new/SA) I see a few instances where msgs get classified as spam tho the report shows the hits DO NOT exceed the required: ---snip form the report--- Content analysis details: (3.40 points, 3.75 required)

RE: [SAtalk] Why tagged as spam when HITS < REQUIRED ??

2003-09-03 Thread Steve Brorens
Hmm, turns out that I'm getting admin messages about these, but they're not actually stopped. Looks like $sa_tag2_level_deflt and $sa_kill_level_deflt in amavisd.conf were the root cause. I've set them to match the sa setting in local.cf and will see how that runs... - steve

[SAtalk] Monitoring which Rules are being used...

2003-09-22 Thread Steve Brorens
SA is doing a superb job in my gateways config (with amavisd-new and clamav), but I'd like to get a better feel for the relative effects of the various rules - in particular BAYES_*, AWL, my 'custom local.cf rules', RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP, AWL... - My logs now show the TotalHits and the RulesInvolve

[SAtalk] Advice on gateway config?

2003-08-04 Thread Steve Brorens
Title: Advice on gateway config? I'm building a small gateway that will sit in front of an Exchange system - sending 'ham' through to the user and redirecting 'spam'  to another email address - which will be a 'public' folder probably. Scott L Henderson's guide to using Amavis and Postfix t