Re: [SAtalk] catching the Banned CD spam!

2003-08-20 Thread Sandy S
I'm no expert so I may be off-base here, but shouldn't the rule have ()? body RULE_NAME /(bannedc|banned c)/i I think that without them you're scanning for one of the following strings: "bannedcanned c" or "bannedbanned c". Sandy - Original Message - From: "John McGivern" <[EMAIL PROTECT

[SAtalk] Plain Text vs. HTML Learning in Bayes

2003-10-03 Thread Sandy S
In cases where both sections are an advertisement it should pick up the appropriate tokens from the HTML section, and in other cases the plain text section is probably just Bayes poison anyway. Just a thought Sandy S. Here's a sample of the body of one of these spams: --=_NextPart

Re: [SAtalk] spam with no body...

2003-07-10 Thread Sandy S
I've been seeing this too, so I added the following rule to my local.cf: header __TEXT_HTML_BA Content-Type =~ /text\/html/i meta NO_BODY_BA __TEXT_HTML_BA && !HTML_MESSAGE describe NO_BODY_BA Message with no body score NO_BODY_BA 4 It's been working great for me. Sandy

Re: [SAtalk] spam funny

2003-07-25 Thread Sandy S
quot;, etc. I'm playing with Chris's OBFU rules, but I'll keep watching the list for more ideas, too - I'd love to be able to catch these! Sandy S. - Original Message - From: "Daniel Carrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin list" <[EM