[SAtalk] non-SPAM gets zero score, but warning text

I did the FreeBSD port install of spamassasin, and ran the initial command line test with a spam message and non-spam message. The spam message worked as one would hope: SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original

[SAtalk] Re: non-SPAM gets zero score, but warning text

Found The Answer. Sorry for the, er, SPAM. /// Rob ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm ___

[SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM!

Maybe it's because I'm filtering my SPAM for later manual "safety" screening as opposed to deleting it completely, but it seems like some of the algorithmically generated scores just pussy-foot around too much. Here's are scores for a recent slip-through, a common pyramid scheme message: X-Spa

Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM!

At 03:23 PM 5/29/2002, Brian May wrote: >Thats why in spam assassin you can set the scores yourself... fit them for >your needs.. Well, adjusting the scores won't necessarily make the tool better. I'm sure that the computationally-derived scores are excellent. In fact, I submit that you've pro

[SAtalk] spam filtering in high-volume environments

Is there any performance data available on large or high-volume SA installations? Any tuning recommendations for installing SA in such environments? Any commercial alternatives that might perform better? Thanks for any info! Off-list replies are fine. /// Rob _