EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Has anyone used SA with Mailman? How do you set that up? I just started up
> a Mailman system and would like to use SA to process submissions and reject
> anything that scores as spam.
--
Matthew Davis
http://dog
the formattting,etc.
If what your saying is correct, and they've done a lot of editing to these emails, are
they reliable to test against? Wouldn't (excus
e the term) virgin spam be more approporiate to test against?
Or are the things they've changed irrelivan
f the headers have been stripped or munged by humans.
But the headers is really were we can catch most of the spammers, so i see it as a
good effort, but useless.
--
Matthew Davis
http://dogpound.vnet.net/
A ne
ve it alone.
defang_mime { 0 | 1 } (default: 1)
By default, SpamAssassin will change the Content-type: header of suspected
spam to "text/plain". This is a safety feature. If you prefer to leave the
Content-type header alone, set this to 0.
---
ded
> no meaningfull information, but maybe now it would. Doh - didn't save
> the URL. Anyone got a clue as to what I might have seem and maybe could
> give me a hint? Chris
----------
| Matthew Davis /\ h
uirements vary widely. Some prefer plain text messages,
> others tolerate or acutally like html - or the content may demand html.
>
> cheers
> -- vbi
>
> --
> featured product: GNU Privacy Guard - http://gnupg.org
--
| Matt
