[SAtalk] Bayes probs

amassassin find it? 2) Why isn't spamc/spamd picking up by bayes DB ? Thanks J -- Justin F. Knotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shampoo.ca --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Rep

[SAtalk] [jknotzke@shampoo.ca: spamassassin and spamd giving very different results]

spamd[25911]: debug: bayes: 25911 untie-ing Aug 6 12:36:50 shampoo spamd[25911]: debug: bayes: 25911 untie-ing db_toks Aug 6 12:36:50 shampoo spamd[25911]: debug: bayes: 25911 untie-ing db_seen Thanks.. J - Forwarded message from "Justin F. Knotzke" <[EM

[SAtalk] spamassassin and spamd giving very different results

al/bin/spamd -d -D -C /etc/spamd.conf The test messages that come with Spamassassin gives the same incorrect results from spamc/spamd. Any ideas? Thanks J -- Justin F. Knotzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.shampoo.ca --- This

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes probs

> At 11:20 PM 8/9/03 -0400, Justin F. Knotzke wrote: > > 1) what version of SA do you have? 2.55 > 2) have you upgraded between versions? if so, what did you have before? I used a much older version before Bayes was supported. > However, it is strange that spamassa

[SAtalk] Re: Bayes probs

of the warning message? This is where something should be printed but isn't.. i figure. I put debugs all over this to see and all the vars appear to have valid vars.. Just to restate that bayes works perfectly when invoking SA using spamassassin -t < SPAM but never using spamd/spamc.