e I guess, because it confuses the heck out of me. I need the
syntax for rules and the location where they go (for systems-wide use).
Your help in pointing me in the correct direction would be most appreciated.
/s/ John Parken
---
Robert:
Thanks for the help.
> Something like
> > body RM_b_V-drug/V[Ii1\|[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> but for the subject, right?
Yes, this is along the lines of what I wanted since, at least my version of
SA, has only a rudimentary test in the body, which does not of ourse address
the Subject li
> Head for http://www.exit0.us and
> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm -- you'll
> find plenty of rules there that will give you a good start at building
> your own rule base, including my own V-drug body test which can be easily
> converted into a subject header test
When I run -
spamassassin -d --lint
on my newly created local.cf file, I get "Command not Found" as the only
reply. Does that mean there is a problem or that the test proceeded to the
end of the file?
/s/ John
---
This sf.net email is spo
The .procmailrc "rule" to send mail determined by SA to be spam is pretty
easy -
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
/home/user/Mail/spam
In other words, if the X-Spam-Status header (added by SA) is "Yes", then the
mail is delivered to the "spam" mailbox specified in the path (your path my
of course be di
Through the news.spamassassin.org site I found what looks
like a good way for Outlook users to get spam (and ham) into the Bayes sa-learn.
Dan Kohn suggestions is at ─ http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.html.
After special handling for mail previously processed by SA
that is now be
his explanation, his work product
seems fatally flawed.
Personally, I think that Logan's explanation for his poor journalistic
effort is just as weak as his initial work product after whatever effect his
copy editor may have had on it.
/s/ John Parken
> -Original Message-
&
