in a word... huh?
-JR
---Original
Message---
Can someone please help me to remove, unsubscribe or disable
the spam assassin? I am a new computer owner and really didn't know what
I was
They also hire marketing firms (or do it themselves) to send UCE promoting
their wares.
I, myself have LART'd them 2 or three times.
> It would be nice if this site would be removed from BigEvilList_130 or
moved
> to BigEvilList_X/Y/Z or whatever.
> I can then remove pandasoftware.com from my wh
SpamAssassin doesn't "dump", delete, block,
redirect,etc ANY emails.
It simply, scans, scores, and stamps the
header.
It is up to your MTA or email client to determine
what is done with messages that receive a score that is at or above your
determined spam threshold.
-JR
- Original Me
Title: Message
I've seen that happen on SA servers/mailserver
running SA, that are "under-powered" (for lack of a better term), or
over-processed.
Either processor or memory utization is being
drained by either the SA processes or the MTA, or a combination of the two (or
other services runni
I'd be interested in seeing that scriptcan you be persuaded to share
with the class?
-JR
> I recently wrote a script to automate spam complaints to the contact
> address(es) of the previous hop before my mail servers, using both a
> Whois lookup by IP address (see Net-Whois-IP-0.35 Perl modu
>How can I change the text that is included in tagged
> >messages, that includes the servername and also includes my
> >email address?
If you got a Windows box, Michael Bell (Guinevere), has created a usefull
win32 app called SAConf , for configuring your SpamAssassin systems.
http://www.openhan
Just curious, if there is a script (be it perl or
otherwise), that anyone has written, that will perform an automated
'download' of the different SARE (or other) SA rulesets?
I wouldn't think this would too difficult to do,
and have a scheduled restart of the MTA calling SA to implement it.
Thanks for all the replies.. I checked the archive, (like i should have
before posting, i know i know..)..
-JR
www.spamfighter.org
> RulesDeJour handles updating the add-on rulesets:
>
> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/RulesDeJour
>
> There's no good way to auto-update the main ruleset.. upgrading
You can ALWAYS get to any of the SARE rulesets (As well as many others),
from the download section of www.spamfighter.org .
These are direct links, with the author's permission, to the updated files
on the authors distribution sites.
Seriously, I requested permission from the authors, to link to t
> Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942
> Number of spams : 91592 ( 45.58%)
> Number of clean messages:109350 ( 54.42%)
> Average message analysis time : 69.27 seconds
> Average spam analysis time :
> Something tells me that most of that time is likely due a couple of
network
> tests that are timing out for _every_ email.
>
>
> ie: he might have DCC installed, but not allow the UDP packets past the
> firewall, which would add 10 seconds to every email (by default, more if
he
> upped the timeo
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
what is up with the SA list? Seems like its choking a lot more frequently
lately.
JR
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. Februar
The very same. However, I didnt know the name
SpamAssassin was trademarked..
-JR
- Original Message -
From:
gentian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 10:08
AM
Subject: [SAtalk] another spamAssassin
???
Is this SpamAssassin the same as
> > Yep, it was trademarked by Deersoft, and now owned by McAfee following
> > their acquisition of Deersoft.
>
>
> Crap! I hope McAfee does not get the idea to start licensing SA. That
would
> suck!
can't license what they don't own... but they could 'try' to piss off the
world and make SpamAssas
SA does have the ability to filter (block/discard)
if so configured.. basically by just setting SA to delete any incoming
scanned msg with a score of 5+ (default score level).
As far as setting up a whitelist, on a win32
implementation of SA, read the SA docs, and/or visit some sites with
While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
> However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> without having to unban every other possible language.
>
>
Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
My clients/customers tend to whine a little
> There are a number of providers that are utterly unresponsive until
> someone (metaphorically) smacks them upside the head with a paving brick.
That works for me.
Where do we sign up?
-JR
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutor
> Anybody who's installed A 2.61
>
> Can you tell me what the score for the following email was
>
> From: Advance in Pay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Need cash in the bank ASAP?
> Date: December 12, 2003 4:28:24 PM CST
> To: Robert David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PRO
There is already a very well documented sendmail/SA/MIMEDeFang how-to
available.
Links to it and other sendmail/procmail/postfix SA articles are available on
www.spamfighter.org
anyway, heres the sendmail/SA/MIMEDeFang how-to:
http://www.rudolphtire.com/mimedefang-howto/
-JR
- Original Messa
Based on your query, I don't think David's suggest was at all 'holier than
thou'.
And I agree with him , that unless you plan on pushing ALL outbound traffic
from all your Webservers utilizing SMTP scripts,pushes,forms,etc to relay
off your SA Gateway before being pushed to the Internet, I would su
> Yep. I googled him and he's the father of an autistic child who is very
> active in promoting awareness and research. Easy to see where the
> hyperdrive comes from. Still... mix in a compassion sandwich in other
> areas of your life will ya, Len!? ;) I know... not here, quake
> server, etc
From: "Keith C. Ivey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bob George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > John Beamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [...] (I particularly like seeing the "* 0.5 -- BODY: Possible porn -
Hot,
> > > Nasty, Wild, Young" rating on a children's autism mailing list...)
> >
> > Ha
relative articles found here:
http://www.spamfighter.org/bb/article.php?46.0
or
http://www.stearns.org/doc/spamassassin-setup.current.html
or
http://www.amimissingsomething.com/archives/40.html
or
http://subwiki.honeypot.net/cgi-bin/view/Freebsd/FilterMailWithSpamAssassin
-JR
- Orig
delete?
seriously though, can you be a little more specific in your question and
configuration?
SA is a scorer of spam - it doesnt delete, move, zap, squash , or block
natively..
Depending on your schema, you would use a MTA, maybe even another form of
Anti-Spam filtration/gateway, or your end user
Chris has been working on this stuff WAY too hard lately
back away from the bigevil Chris... back away
remember 'sun light' and 'trees' ? remember how pretty those are?
pretty pretty trees
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spamassassin-Talk
You stated you setup the DNS server for the test network.. but you didn't
say what nameservers your prod servers are using...and if there if you have
xfer'd the zones or not so the prod nameservers have the updated information
for your testnetwork's zone.
-JR
- Original Message -
From: "
27 matches
Mail list logo
