Hello,
I just installed Spamassassin sitewide, and love it! Thanks for a Great
Program. Now, a couple of questions. At the same time, I installed
MailScanner for virus scanning of attachments. MailScanner supports
SpamAssassin; however, it isn't clear whether the spamc or the
spamassissin per
The users on my mail server are accessing their e-mail remotely via IMAP or POP3 using an MUA such as Evolution or Outlook. Now, has anyone figured out a way to report spam via a remote MUA? It would involve running spammassasin -r remotely. Has there been any work in this area? It would be
Just a thought...
But wouldn't it be better to let a program designed specifically for
removing virii handle this? The latest version of MailScanner can detect &
remove MyParty.
Check out www.mailscanner.info for more information. The setup I currently
use is: SendMail + SpamAssassin (using spam
les are
worthy, and which ones are not. I'm sure this is a gross
oversimplification of what actually occurs... =)
Gene Ruebsamen
On Wed, 2002-01-30 at 17:47, Olivier Nicole wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if/how I should/could update the ponderations that are given
> by the genetic al
I agree, we should be careful with the word debt. Being in the Real Estate
field, I often communicate with my clients via e-mail, and I can only
imagine the number of times the word "debt" is used in our communications.
This is likely to be a problem in business related e-mails vs. technical
e-ma
I think the Genetic Algorithm (GA) assigns all the scores now. GA's are very
powerful optimization tools, and if the GA lowered those scores, it likely
raised (compensated) other scores that were more common spam signatures.
The GA is only as good as the population of data it is run on. Craig po
I tend to agree..
I would trust the GA on this one, irrelavent rules will tend to get
low/irrelavent scores over time. Because the GA caught the spam using other
rules, the "HUNZA BREAD" rule probably has become irrelavent.
Instead of manually fiddling with the scores of those rules, I would sa
: user not specified,
not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
can anyone help?
thanks,
Gene Ruebsamen
Sales Associate
ERA Champion Realty, Inc.
(714) 534-4425
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net
, you
may want to put this into the FAQ.
Thank You,
Gene Ruebsamen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gene
> Ruebsamen
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:00 PM
> To: Spamassassin-talk@lists. sourceforge. net
> Subject
amc (as per instructions on
spamassassin.org).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank You,
Gene Ruebsamen
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Duncan Findlay
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:26 PM
> To: Spamassassin
al:99 in 0 seconds.
With Spamassassin version 2.01 I received the same log messages as above;
however, switching to version 2.11 I do not get spamd identifying the
message as spam or being clean.
Something is wrong... Is anyone else experiencing
ing as root (well you did not change spamd to run as non-root). So
> both messages are not errors.
>
> Now how do you call spamc from procmail?
:0fw
| spamc
as stated in the www.spamassassin.org/sitewide.html file.
> Olivier
>
> __
12 matches
Mail list logo
