Re: [SAtalk] Improvement: Image Recognition as spam criteria

2004-01-15 Thread Alexander Litvinov
> Hint: I think we should store these things in a SQL database instead of in > the file system, shouldn't we? It is even possible to replace Berkeley DB with sql frontend and allow to use postgres and for those who don't want to use sql server - sqlite > > possibley even design a DCC / pyzor / r

Re: [SAtalk] X-Header: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Litvinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In some RFC written that subject MUST contain only 7-bit characters. Very often mailers skip this requirement and put 8-bit chars (i.e national alphabetic symbols) in raw 8-bit form. This is detected as SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS, IMHO. On Среда, 1 Октябрь

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin 2.50 rewrites Received: headers, how to stop it?

2003-02-21 Thread Alexander Litvinov
If this option is set to 0, incoming spam is only modified by >>adding some headers and no changes will be >>made to the body. >> >>I'm using report_safe 0 (along with report_header 1) and it gives the old >>behaviour. >> >>Regards, >>S

Re: [SAtalk] AutoResponse - Email Returned SAXK (KMM27083964V26088L0KM)

2003-02-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
Why this spam has -100.00 score ??? X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=CLICK_BELOW,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST, X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.50 On Среда, 26 Февраль 2003 08:21, PayPal Customer Service 3 wrote: > Thank you for contacting PayPal Cu

Re: [SAtalk] Re: AutoResponse - Email Returned SAXK (KMM27083964V26088L0KM)

2003-02-26 Thread Alexander Litvinov
Thanks for detailed description. What if spammers start to send spam using @paypal.com from addresses? On Среда, 26 Февраль 2003 21:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This sender (paypal) is built-in in the default SA rules. It is supposed > to never send > spam to you. And the actual message you rec

Re: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-03-10 Thread Alexander Litvinov
On Вторник, 11 Март 2003 12:40, Mieko Miyazaki wrote: > Do not Send!! I hate What don't you want to recieve ? :-) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

Re: [SAtalk] Non English Email

2003-06-11 Thread Alexander Litvinov
On Среда, 11 Июнь 2003 16:09, Mark wrote: > I am using Spamassassin to filter english and italian > email but the false positive rate seems to be allot > higher with the italian email, does anyone have any > experience using SA with non english email ? Are > there any options to help my situation ?

Re: [SAtalk] Phrase for Nigerian spams...

2003-06-20 Thread Alexander Litvinov
It seems to me catching such spam is the work for bayers filter. On Пятница, 20 Июнь 2003 16:57, Simon Byrnand wrote: > Just wondering if any updates have been done to the nigerian rules for 2.60 > ? > > I notice that all the recent ones I've seen lately seem to start with > > "FROM THE DESK OF" f

Re: SV: [SAtalk] Target those 3l33+ typings

2003-06-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
I belive this is work for bayes. I just wondering why people turn it off ? Why they try to use 'manual' bayes filtering ? > > Wouldn't it be possible to expand all tests so that they can match all > > those p0rn, rem0ve and g1rls and so on > > Perhaps uri references to real live p0rn sites, so tha

Re: [SAtalk] SA with Kmail

2003-06-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
On Четверг, 26 Июнь 2003 09:51, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > We are in the process of setting up a new server and until that is finished > we're hauling our mail down with kmail. We have it piping thru SA. The > problem is that things get awfully slow that way. I belive this is a kmail > problem, no

Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list?

2003-06-30 Thread Alexander Litvinov
I run SA to this list and I have no problems. On Понедельник, 30 Июнь 2003 14:10, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Isn't this list the last place one expects to find spam? > > ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken. > System Attendant: > Mail Adminstrator :Blocked File Attachment >

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Re: Need a procmail recipe to redirect spam.

2003-07-16 Thread Alexander Litvinov
> That will work, but if everyone starts doing it then spammers will start > forging X-Spam-Status lines into their spam. The idea is good but that > implementation is trivially defeated. It seems to much better solution will be | spamassassin --remove-markup | spamassassin (remove any markup by

Re: [SAtalk] spam funny

2003-07-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Of course, in theory spammers could start including things that look like > PGP signatures. But since most people don't use PGP or GnuPG, we don't > have to worry about this. > > Later of, if spammers start to add fake PGP signatures, we can call an

Re: [SAtalk] spam funny

2003-07-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > The point is, checking the PGP signature is a good way of finding out if > someone is supposed to be writing to you. If there is a recognizable PGP > sig, it counts very well (e.g. -4.5) if it's not recognized it counts a > little bad (e.g. +1.0) H

Re: [SAtalk] A faster and more scalable matching engine.

2003-11-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
Heh, it seems it would be nice to make SA scan messages fatser. If I undersand your idea correctly, you want not to run regexp one by one, but write the state machine for all regepes and walk on this states by the mail, but... I undersand how this may be faster (liner time of the message size) i

[SAtalk] Re: A faster and more scalable matching engine.

2003-11-25 Thread Alexander Litvinov
> Its relatively straightforward, and has been known for about 30 > years. See the Dragon book, chapter 3. Add a few enhancements and you > get an engine with the same semantics that SA uses, recognizing > overlapping and concurrent patterns at all locations in the input. Thank for point. Its time

Re: [SAtalk] Announce: CMOScript version 0.00.0.0001g available for download (REPOST)

2003-12-02 Thread Alexander Litvinov
Nice script... is it possible to learn SA automagicly use such logic ? On Вторник, 2 Декабрь 2003 12:27, Chris Thielen wrote: > Greetings all! > > (I'm reposting this announcement as the original seems to have gotten lost > in the SourceForge scheduled downtime) > > CMOScript version 0.00.0.0001g

[SAtalk] Bayes database stats

2003-12-13 Thread Alexander Litvinov
Today I have dumped my bayes db and calculate some statistics. 742753 - total number of words in it 515654 - total number of words which have been seen only once 80485 - ... twice 35325 - ... 3 times This statistics shows that most of the db us not used, just eating my hard drive (44 MB to

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Bayes database stats

2003-12-15 Thread Alexander Litvinov
> How did you calculate those statistics -- does sa-learn do this, or did > you code up something for sa-learn's output? I have written small perl script for this. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Bayes database stats

2003-12-15 Thread Alexander Litvinov
> Plus, Alexander may have been just counting up the total Bayes directory > size, which could very likely bring it at least to 44. > LANG=C ls -lah ~/.spamassassin/ total 68M drwx--2 lan users 288 Dec 16 09:21 . drwx-- 73 lan users4.5k Dec 15 19:27 .. -rw--

[SAtalk] Score for hand-written test

2004-01-04 Thread Alexander Litvinov
ll be enought to score this test. Alexander Litvinov. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bas

Re: [SAtalk] Score for hand-written test

2004-01-04 Thread Alexander Litvinov
On Понедельник, 5 Январь 2004 10:40, Robert Menschel wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > Sunday, January 4, 2004, 7:43:59 PM, you wrote: > > AL> I have written some tests and don't know what is the score set for > these AL> tests. Can some one make the suggestion how to score tests ? > > I have several a