Re: [SAtalk] Rule for Juno/Netzero

2003-01-28 Thread Tony Earnshaw
tir, 2003-01-28 kl. 19:44 skrev Debbie D: > So I believe that a rule needs to be added that reduces the score on a legit > Juno mail.. Can someone help me out here?? Isn't that what whitelist_from/whitelist_from_rcvd is for? That's what I use it for, at any rate. Best, Tony -- Tony Earnshaw

Re: [SAtalk] whitelist with spamassassin ?

2003-01-28 Thread Matt Kettler
The problem here is that Microsoft is too lazy to set up DNS for the server delivering this mail. Until they do so, whitelist_from_rcvd will NOT work. As per the man page, the part of the Received header searched MUST be next to a bracketed IP address to prevent simple HELO spoofing. Received:

[SAtalk] Missing Spam-Level tags

2003-01-28 Thread Tom Allison
I keep getting headers like this: X-Spam-Status has a write-up on the hits... X-Spam-Level is always present, but empty. Now, I do not have anything in my directories which is currently recorded as Spam (hits >= 5.0). Is it "OK" that the X-Spam-Level shows nothing until (I assume here) there is

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for Juno/Netzero

2003-01-28 Thread Robert J. Accettura
This is one of a few rules (along with the HTML only rule) that shouldn't truely be in SpamAssassin. IMHO SpamAssassins rule should be oriented to things ALWAYS found in spam, or should have exceptions to compensate. As for this issue Forged_Juno_Rcvd shouldn't be so high, or should be counte