On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:28:43PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> That has nothing to do with -F, disable defang_mime.
I use qmail-scanner, and their FAQ, item 10 says:
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/FAQ.php
"Finally, never forget the "-F 0" option. Without it, you will CORRUPT EVERY S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am using the current cvs with perl 5.6.1 and I am seeing this:
Sep 12 23:44:33 bsod spamd[5705]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 590.
I am not t
On Thursday 12 September 2002 18:26, Duncan Findlay wrote:
#
# Regardless of the error code, spammers won't continue to spam if the
# mail bounces. If they no spam won't go through, they won't try.
#
I guess that depends on your definition of spammers. If you include the
biggies which claim tha
Barry Jaspan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marcelo,
Daniel
> I'm glad to hear you are looking into Bayesian filtering. There is some
> pretty useful and extensive literature already published on the subject,
> much more than just Paul Graham's article. You should read Jason Rennie's
> art
Now, how do we detect something like this gem?
--
X-From-Line: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 12 22:32:50 2002
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cs.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8874A9B8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002
On 12 Sep 2002, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Yes, I've read Jason's paper more than once. (I did mention ifile and
> that it has been around since at least 1997 in my last email.)
Is ifile good enough to just setup a hook for however? It seems pretty
simple and reasonible fast (been looking at pages
