RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Useless HTML Code

2003-10-30 Thread Chris Santerre
> that rule is where > a break was. Looks like Outlook decided to capitalize the I > for me for some > reason. LOL, I can see the little clippy now... "I see you are writing regex, shall I screw it up for you?" :D -Chris --- This SF.net em

RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Useless HTML Code

2003-10-30 Thread Chris Santerre
> > CORRECTION TO RULES: > > Matt, I liked your rules and added them to my system and ran > a debug, and it reported the following error: > *snip* > > It looks like the problem is that you used a capital /I > rather than lower case /i - in any case, that fixed it for > me. > Thank Abigail! I

RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Useless HTML Code

2003-10-30 Thread Yackley, Matt
> -Original Message- > From: Abigail Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:49 PM > To: Yackley, Matt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Useless HTML Code > > CORRECTION TO RULES: > > Matt, I liked your

Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Useless HTML Code

2003-10-30 Thread Abigail Marshall
CORRECTION TO RULES: Matt, I liked your rules and added them to my system and ran a debug, and it reported the following error: error> Bareword found where operator expected at rule error> MY_USELESS_S, line 1, near "/<\/s>/I" (Missing error> operator before I?) Failed to compile body error> Spam