> -Original Message-
> From: Yorkshire Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:58 PM
> To: Chris Santerre; spamassassin list
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] [RD] Rule Philosophy
>
>
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:14, Chris Santerre wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Matt, Chris,
Monday, August 4, 2003, 11:03:04 PM, Matt wrote:
MK> At 09:45 PM 8/4/03 -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
>>uri L_u_time4more /time4more\.net/i
>>describe L_u_time4more Body text references known spammer
>>score L_u_time4m
*big snip to save bandwidth* :-)
Wow this is a great discussion! Lots of stuff to cover. I guess the whole
local rule submission thing first. It is WAY too big for one person. I like
the idea of 1 person in charge of one type of rule. Like "From" or
"subject". People could submit rules to that per
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:14, Chris Santerre wrote:
> *big snip to save bandwidth* :-)
>
> Wow this is a great discussion! Lots of stuff to cover. I guess the whole
> local rule submission thing first. It is WAY too big for one person. I like
> the idea of 1 person in charge of one type of rule. Li
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 05:39, Robert Menschel wrote:
> CS> For those who may not see it, these are not the sender of the spam
> CS> domains, but the domain of the image hosts, often owned by spammers.
> CS> Therefore it is ever changing like a RBL. So submissions of these to
> CS> the Rule Emporium
