Did you lint your config to make sure there's no typoes that are confusing SA?
Just run the command-line version to check your files for errors:
spamassassin --lint -D
and see if it complains about errors processing the config files. This has
bitten me in the back-end several times. Since SA is
Thanks Kenneth,
> 1. you didn't restart spamd after changing the sitewide config file
You got it first try. I didn't realise that spamd had to be restarted to
re-read the local.cf file. :-|
Thanks again
Barry
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[E
You're right, sorry. I was referring to whitelist_to which is only a -6.0
bonus.
Best,
Kenneth
---
Kenneth Chen
Unit Supervisor, Clark Kerr and UVA
Residential Computing
University of California, Berkeley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Craig R Hughes wro
Kenneth Chen wrote:
> I believe the whitelist entry simply gives it a negative score in addition
> to whatever positive scores it would have obtained via the rules. That is
> to say, if your spam message would have been 20.3 points without your
> whitelist entry, it'd only be something like 15.3
Hi Barry:
I believe the whitelist entry simply gives it a negative score in addition
to whatever positive scores it would have obtained via the rules. That is
to say, if your spam message would have been 20.3 points without your
whitelist entry, it'd only be something like 15.3 with (because the
