At Thu Jan 15 08:49:37 2004, =?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Ruempler?= wrote:
>
> hi list,
>
> I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
I've picked out the following, which are common to other similar
messages I've seen:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="3
ly got a rule to nail that sucker and now I'm not
getting any :(
--Chris (Where is my spam?) Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Guenthner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:22 AM
> To: Sönke Ruempler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
At 03:49 AM 01/15/04, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
hi list,
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
We have been catching them with the following:
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0 local_XMAILER_BOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[a-z][^A-Z0-9]*$/
* 2.0 LE_NI BODY: obfuscated not interested
At 09:49 AM 1/15/04 +0100, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Simple starting things to check (if you're not already doing them)
1) use razor, dcc and/or pyzor.
2) Make sure your bayes is heavily trained (really, this batch of "poison"
has not been
Hi
How about a URI rule testing for the holdontrynow.com link??
Cheers
Ralf G.
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
hi list,
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 62.116.172.149 (68.116.240.99:4887)
by mail
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: confiscate cosponsor gnat
> X-Mailer: huh
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=107361675716894&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=107408986927266&w=2
--
