On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:32:35PM -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> hmm -- Theo? Sounds OK to me, I thought that was already the default ;)
hmmm. it is, sorta. apparently the subsys locks are still spamd,
but the sysconfig file is spamassassin now (the spec file enforces this too).
I'm opening a
Warren Togami writes:
>+ /usr/bin/perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=/var/tmp/spamassassin-root//usr
>SYSCONFDIR=/var/tmp/spamassassin-root//etc INST_PREFIX=/usr
>INST_SYSCONFDIR=/etc INSTALLDIRS=vendor
>What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report
>text for users who want more infor
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:16, Justin Mason wrote:
> I've just rebuilt these, as the distributed ones didn't have
> up-to-date Changes lists. These ones now do. No code or rule
> changes, so if you've already got the others, don't worry about it.
>
> md5sums:
>
> a7898286e2dc9f6102aecedbfe6c818
"Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What version should the PR1 indicate in the headers? Below is the
> output of mine. Not sure if the PR1 installed correctly or not.
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.193-2003-06-13-exp) on mail
That's right. The version is usually 2.60-cvs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> md5sums:
>
> a7898286e2dc9f6102aecedbfe6c818b Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-PR1.tar.gz
> ecf9bdd1315b39e4201b662e39cdb7c5 Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-PR1.zip
>
> --j.
What version should the PR1 indicate in the headers? Below is the output of
mine. Not sure if the PR1 installe
