At 03:36 PM 11/20/03 +, Carlos Jorge Santos wrote:
The header X-Spam-Status shouldn't cause any trouble to sa-learn, right?
What about the other header ? Is there any problem removing all the
Received headers ? Something like this :
bayes_ignore_header Received
No.. X-Spam-Status is a standa
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Carlos Jorge Santos wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>
> The problem now is that SpamAssassin (spamc to be more precise) is
> called by Qmail-Scanner, which in turn adds this headers to emails:
>
> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.host-services.com by
> uid 101 w
>From the sa-learn man page:
"If the messages you are learning from have already been filtered
through SpamAssassin, the learner will compensate for this. In effect, it
learns what each message would look like if you had run `spamassassin -d'
over it in advance."
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:39
Thanks a lot for your answer.
The problem now is that SpamAssassin (spamc to be more precise) is
called by Qmail-Scanner, which in turn adds this headers to emails:
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mail.host-services.com by
uid 101 wi
(spamassassin: 2.60. Clear:RC:0:SA:1(11.3/8.0):.
Proce
At 12:39 PM 11/20/03 +, Carlos Jorge Santos wrote:
We're in the process of feeding sa-learn with spam and ham so we can use
The Bayes filters.
But a doubt has crossed our mind... All of our Spam has the SpamAssassin
header, feeding this mails to sa-learn will make the Bayes database thins
th
