Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-14 Thread Martin Radford
At Mon Aug 4 22:38:46 2003, Florian Effenberger wrote: > > Hello, > > is there any possibility of removing the > > X-Spam-Checker-Version > > header line from messages? I was unable to do so :( I'm puzzled as to why you would want to do this. Can you enlighten us? Martin -- Martin Radfor

Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-05 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hi Bart, thanks, it works! :-) Florian - Original Message - From: "Bart Schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version :0 fhw | formail -I

Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-04 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Florian Effenberger wrote: > Is there an option within procmail to filter out headers? So I could do > it via procmail instead of modifying the code... :0 fhw | formail -I X-Spam-Checker-Version: --- This SF.Net email spon

Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-04 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:57:31PM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > thanks for the quick reply! Is there an option within procmail to filter out > headers? So I could do it via procmail instead of modifying the code... not via procmail, but you could use formail. I wouldn't suggest removing it

Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-04 Thread Florian Effenberger
er" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:52 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Report

Re: [SAtalk] removing X-Spam-Checker-Version

2003-08-04 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > is there any possibility of removing the > > X-Spam-Checker-Version > > header line from messages? I was unable to do so :( not without modifying the code. that's the only header required to be in there. from the as-yet unr