At Wed Jan 28 23:01:48 2004, Brett Dikeman wrote:
>
> Martin Radford wrote:
>
> > It might be because you get the occasional false positive that you
> > want to avoid (but all the rest come under your threshold). You
> > probably would want these autolearned as ham.
>
> Actually, at the moment
Brett Dikeman wrote:
> I tried setting bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam to a positive
> value- almost all legitimate email we get on the particular system is
> marked somewhere between 0 and 2- rarely any lower. Ever(save for
> whitelisting).
You've found the right setting, and I'm not aware of
At Fri Jan 23 19:44:34 2004, Brett Dikeman wrote:
>
> Also- maybe it's just me, but it seems rather silly to not allow the
> user to auto-learn messages that have been whitelisted, either sitewide
> or user-specific. Could someone a)explain the reasoning here and b)tell
> me how to change this?
Martin Radford wrote:
It might be because you get the occasional false positive that you
want to avoid (but all the rest come under your threshold). You
probably would want these autolearned as ham.
Actually, at the moment the bayes engine thinks 99% of the messages
going through it are spam, si
