Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 2 September 2003 at 10:01:21 -0400
> From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is anybody working on a rule for lots of garbage words in email? Now,
> > if I were a spammer I'd pick real words out of a dictionary, which is
> > easy eno
check www.exit0.us in the random letters section. Fred's have been working
great.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Dyer-Bennet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] garbage
>
>
> I've been seeing more and more
At 12:16 PM 9/1/2003 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
I've been seeing more and more spam using sequences of garbage
character strings; I'm guessing to get around Bayesian filtering?
Also the obfuscating comments seem to contain garbage strings, but the
existing rule finds those pretty well.
Is anyb
