RE: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

2003-12-02 Thread Aaron Young
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Gary Funck wrote: > As it stands, this recipe only checks that the there is a line whose > first charcater is not a space or a tab. And if this sort of mesage is > found, it is deposited in the spam folder. Likely not what was intended. Oops, you are right. This is probably w

RE: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

2003-12-02 Thread Gary Funck
As it stands, this recipe only checks that the there is a line whose first charcater is not a space or a tab. And if this sort of mesage is found, it is deposited in the spam folder. Likely not what was intended. > -Original Message- > From: Aaron Young > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

2003-12-01 Thread Yorkshire Dave
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:02:35 -0500 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: > >I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. > >Ho can I do this? > > That would be pretty difficult to do in SA using a rule. > > The big problem is that SA's "body"

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

2003-12-01 Thread Aaron Young
At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: > I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. > Ho can I do this? In .procmailrc: :0B: * ! ^[^ ] spam That's a caret, a space, and a tab between the square brackets. --- This SF.ne

Re: [SAtalk] empty e-mails

2003-12-01 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:59 AM 12/1/2003, Korchmenuk Nickolay wrote: I want mark e-mails with empty body as spam. Ho can I do this? That would be pretty difficult to do in SA using a rule. The big problem is that SA's "body" ruletype also includes the subject line text (this avoids massive duplication of rules).