Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

2003-09-22 Thread Pete O'Hara
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:38:40PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: Yes, I figured that if for some reason the 50k was too low that I should endup with 100k, but I here I have 165k and this is what is confusing me. 0.000 0 165010 0 non-token data: ntokens

Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

2003-09-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:38:40PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: > Yes, I figured that if for some reason the 50k was too low that I should > endup with 100k, but I here I have 165k and this is what is confusing me. > 0.000 0 165010 0 non-token data: ntokens Just remember, it's

Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

2003-09-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:42:16AM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: > bayes_expiry_max_db_size 5 # this is to force an auto expiry That's probably going to confuse things a lot. As the docs say: bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15) What should be the maximum size of th

Re: [SAtalk] bayes auto expiry

2003-09-19 Thread Pete O'Hara
Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:42:16AM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote: bayes_expiry_max_db_size 5 # this is to force an auto expiry That's probably going to confuse things a lot. As the docs say: bayes_expiry_max_db_size (default: 15) What shoul