On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 08 March 2002, Craig Hughes said:
> > I think for this setup, where most of the addresses are not mapped in
> > /etc/passwd (and so have no ~ directory), you should look at storing the
> > configurations in a database and use the SQL stuff.
>
> Blech. I
On 3/8/02 12:49 PM, "Greg Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08 March 2002, Craig Hughes said:
>> I think for this setup, where most of the addresses are not mapped in
>> /etc/passwd (and so have no ~ directory), you should look at storing the
>> configurations in a database and use the SQL st
On 08 March 2002, Craig Hughes said:
> I think for this setup, where most of the addresses are not mapped in
> /etc/passwd (and so have no ~ directory), you should look at storing the
> configurations in a database and use the SQL stuff.
Blech. I don't want to have to run a big hairy database ju
On 3/6/02 7:42 AM, "Greg Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Richard Sonnen]
>> It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
>> specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
>>
>> spamc --cf /path/to/system/conf/dir --rf /path/to/user/rules
>
> [Craig Hughes]
>> Which enti
[Richard Sonnen]
> It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
> specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
>
> spamc --cf /path/to/system/conf/dir --rf /path/to/user/rules
[Craig Hughes]
> Which entirely defeats the purpose of spamd -- to pre-compile the
> rules.
That
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Richard Sonnen wrote:
> An off-list discussion of the SA config process brought up an
> unrelated good idea that I'm passing along:
>
> It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
> specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
>
> spamc --cf /path/to/sy
On 3/5/02 4:25 PM, "Richard Sonnen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be useful to set up spamc and spamd so that you could
> specify alternate config files more easily. i.e.
>
> spamc --cf /path/to/system/conf/dir --rf /path/to/user/rules
>
> The flags (if present) would be passed on to s
