Re: [SAtalk] X-Mailer is totally bogus

2004-01-06 Thread Anthony Martinez
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:03:59AM +0100, John Wilcock carved this out of pure phosphors: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:35:30 -0700, Anthony Martinez wrote: > > In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the > > X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this > > > > X-Mai

Re: [SAtalk] X-Mailer is totally bogus

2004-01-06 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Tue, 06 Jan 2004 08:03:59 +0100 John Wilcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:35:30 -0700, Anthony Martinez wrote: > > In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the > > X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this > > > > X-Mailer: cyan exiti

Re: [SAtalk] X-Mailer is totally bogus

2004-01-06 Thread John Wilcock
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:35:30 -0700, Anthony Martinez wrote: > In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the > X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this > > X-Mailer: cyan exiting space > > header XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[^A-Z0-9]*$/ > describe XM