RE: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:35 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential > > > Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This > Nigerian spam was almost certainly

Re: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Michael Parker
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:40AM -0600, Stewart, John wrote: > > > Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for > > SQL-stored Bayes databases. > > > > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main > > tree since then, > > but it's possible I've missed i

RE: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-24 Thread Stewart, John
> Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for > SQL-stored Bayes databases. > > I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main > tree since then, > but it's possible I've missed it. Hmm... I don't recall seeing this at all; does anyone have any info on t

Re: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential

2003-11-23 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Dan Kohn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/11/03 14:35]: > Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This > Nigerian spam was almost certainly continually resent against > SpamAssassin 2.60. Each time, the words were altered slightly until > none of the rules fired. However,