At 07:56 PM 11/22/03 -0800, John Oliver wrote:
> 1) The Swen virus is not spam. It should be caught by anti-virus
> software, not by anti-spam software.
It's email that I don't want. It has a predictable From: and/or
Subject: and so should be able to be scored very high.
Agreed that swen emails ma
Hi,
On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:56:07 -0800 John Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 06:24:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello John,
> >
> > Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you wrote:
> >
> > JO> I s
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 06:24:38PM -0800, Robert Menschel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello John,
>
> Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you wrote:
>
> JO> I started using the default setting of 5 in user_prefs. This caught
> JO> *very* little spam. Most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello John,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:24:01 PM, you wrote:
JO> I started using the default setting of 5 in user_prefs. This caught
JO> *very* little spam. Most of the Swen virus emails, for example,
JO> still get through with scores of about 2
