On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:26:20PM -0600, Cal Evans wrote:
> Is it currently in the CVS version? Are there reasonable docs?
> (Reasonable to a sys-admin, I don't yet need the dummies guide.) :)
>
It currently only exists in my development tree, it's not in CVS or
SVN. If you want a not quite re
Is it currently in the CVS version? Are there reasonable docs?
(Reasonable to a sys-admin, I don't yet need the dummies guide.) :)
Let me know how I may be of service,
=C=
* Cal Evans
* http://www.eicc.com
* We take care of your IT,
* So you can take care of your business.
*
* I think inside the
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Cal Evans wrote:
> Can you give us an idea of what version of SA this will be available in?
>
I'd love to see it in 2.70 but that's up to the devs. I think it
might take some soak time, at least for the bayes changes, just due to
the re-implementation of
Can you give us an idea of what version of SA this will be available in?
Let me know how I may be of service,
=C=
* Cal Evans
* http://www.eicc.com
* We take care of your IT,
* So you can take care of your business.
*
* I think inside the sphere.
Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:05
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:05:31PM -0600, Stewart, John wrote:
>
> > I've had my AWL data in a SQL database for almost a year now
>
> Michael - does your code handle per-user AWL and bayes in SQL, or just
> site-wide?
It handles per-user for both. In addition, the bayes code allows for
what I c
> I've had my AWL data in a SQL database for almost a year now
Michael - does your code handle per-user AWL and bayes in SQL, or just
site-wide?
thanks!
johnS
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in L
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:37:36PM +0100, Tim Stoop wrote:
>
> I know you haven't seen me here before (at least, not very often), but I have
> a question. Could I get an update on how far the developers are with making
> it possible to put a personal AWL, Bayes, etc. in a database? And does it
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:13:12 +0200 "Hubert Daubmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> my postmaster has pointed me to this discussion list
>
> --
>
[...]
> I would like to outline a problem and like to ask for updating the
> manufacturer strings for Microsoft Out
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hi Rich,
3) Add the following line to /etc/apt/apt.conf:
APT::Default-Release "stable";
and the following to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://debian.2z.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
?? Not found!?
Err http://debian.2z.net unstable/main Packages
404 Not Found
I
Matt Kettler writes:
> At 01:27 PM 8/15/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
> >hmm, must have missed this. Why would we need to extend the deadline? ;)
> >All mass-check data should be in by now.
>
> I said I wasn't sure if they had or not.. I didn't see any posts on SaDev
> that would indicate that
At 01:27 PM 8/15/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
hmm, must have missed this. Why would we need to extend the deadline? ;)
All mass-check data should be in by now.
I said I wasn't sure if they had or not.. I didn't see any posts on SaDev
that would indicate that all the mass-check data was in, but I
Jim Knuth writes:
> Hi Matt,
>
> > they extended the deadline or not, but either way they'll need to do a GA
> > run on that data and then look at the overall results and test for a bit
> > before releasing.
> >
>
> thank you. Can you inform me (the list),
> if something new happens?
hmm, must
Hi Matt,
> they extended the deadline or not, but either way they'll need to do a GA
> run on that data and then look at the overall results and test for a bit
> before releasing.
>
thank you. Can you inform me (the list),
if something new happens?
cu Jim
---
Hi Rich,
> 3) Add the following line to /etc/apt/apt.conf:
> APT::Default-Release "stable";
>
> and the following to /etc/apt/sources.list:
> deb http://debian.2z.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free
>
?? Not found!?
Err http://debian.2z.net unstable/main Packages
404 Not Found
Ign htt
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello,
how can I update (upgrade) under Debian (3.0 Woody)
of SA 2.55 on SA 2.60?
cu Jim
Thank you for help
Jim,
I can think of several options, each with advantages/disadvantages:
1) Upgrade your entire system to unstable (probably not what you want to
do if it's a product
At 04:46 PM 8/15/03 +0200, you wrote:
how can I update (upgrade) under Debian (3.0 Woody)
of SA 2.55 on SA 2.60?
Well, SA 2.60 isn't released yet.. it's a development version right now.
However, if you want to play with it, there are snapshot tarballs available
on the spamassassin.org website. Ju
I love the new look. Hated the yellow, reminded me of default exchange web
access screen ;)
I've got a few more things I want to add today. This wiki will rock!
I changed the front page around a little. I wanted to put more of the tips
or howto pages together at the top, and the cusom rules toget
Chris Santerre wrote:
I love the new look. Hated the yellow, reminded me of default exchange web
access screen ;)
I've got a few more things I want to add today. This wiki will rock!
I changed the front page around a little. I wanted to put more of the tips
or howto pages together at the top, and
tor, 29.05.2003 kl. 16.23 skrev Mark Thornton:
> The reason: apparently the dns load from the relay server was sufficient to
> drive our primary dns server's cache into some form of corruption. It would
> resolve local sites fine but not external sites until reset. As a result the
> relay server w
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:35:35AM -0500, Pinku Surana wrote:
> Is there a way to update the ruleset with the latest on the spamassassin
> servers? Something like "spamassassin --update hostname" would be nice.
nope. the only way to upgrade the rules is to upgrade the whole package.
--
Randoml
20 matches
Mail list logo
