On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 11:33:01AM -0400, Cliff Browning wrote:
> What I want to do is let the users have a seperate file they can drop
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s in and not have to figure out how to use the tags.
>
> Most of my users are PC users and having to log into a UNIX machine is
> something
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 02:58:24PM -0400, Cliff Browning wrote:
>Exactly how do you use this test. Is there supposed to be a file
> with a list that it looks at?
Check the manual pages for the details. There's e.g. whitelist_from that
you can use globally or from user's config files.
--
(
* Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 7:55am]:
> At 10:39 PM 7/28/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
> >check for another instance of user_prefs somewhere on your system.
> >looks like your own email is the from. some spammers like to put your
> >email
> >as the from so it will fool spam ass
At 10:39 PM 7/28/03 -0600, Alan Fullmer wrote:
check for another instance of user_prefs somewhere on your system.
looks like your own email is the from. some spammers like to put your email
as the from so it will fool spam assassin's default setup.
Also be sure to check to see if it matches one of
At 7/28/03 08:19 PM , Peter Horst wrote:
What does USER_IN_WHITELIST mean? I don't have any whitelists set up at
all. I couldn't find anything in the Conf manpage or FAQ about this --
if it helps, here's my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
Hae you checked ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs? In general, I'
check for another instance of user_prefs somewhere on your system.
looks like your own email is the from. some spammers like to put your email
as the from so it will fool spam assassin's default setup.
Alan Fullmer Owner / Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Xnote Communications
www.xnote.com
-
On Wed Apr 17 at 02:11:19 PM, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> /usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf
>
> Are you hitting any of those?
Ahh, yes. Actually I am. My employer's domain name is in there.
That explains it. Thanks.
sean
--
Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "For all you know
http://www.do
/usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf
Are you hitting any of those?
C
Sean Harding wrote:
SH> Why does mail from my work account to my home account always get the
SH> USER_IN_WHITELIST test? I have not entered my work email address or domain
SH> in the whitelist. My entire whitelist is:
SH>
auto-whitelist is enabled.
If I remember correctly, if three non-spam e-mails make it through your
filters the address is automatically added to your auto-whitelist. I might
be wrong on the numbers needed to trip the auto-whitelist function, but I'm
fairly positive this is what is happening on yo
On Wed Apr 17 at 12:24:10 PM, Michael C. Hanson wrote:
> auto-whitelist is enabled.
I thought that would trigger the AWL rule, not the USER_IN_WHITELIST rule?
sean
--
Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "We greet each other in a
http://www.dogcow.org/sean/ | wild profusion of words"
Craig,
Sorry for being confusing. Amazon is in the rule 60, the same as Yahoo
that was discussed earlier (added by JM as a test?) and trigering the
whitelist test.
OK, I think I will remove the set of rules, there is no reason that SA
comes with a preconfigured whitelist.
Olivier
>Yeah, I thin
Yeah, I think amazon is a question of personal taste whether you want
their mail or not. I would recommend a site-specific rule on that, or a
per-user one if you're multi-user. Personally, about 50% of what they
send is what I'd call "vaguely solicited" and the other 50% is stuff I
want to get.
Hello,
I got some spam delivered from amazon and it went thru because
amazon.com is in rule 60.
I know I never subscrib to anything at amazon. I even think I never
went to their pages (but wouldn't swear it). So it IS spam, as it is
fully unscolicited.
Olivier
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but Ya
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:34:00PM -0500, rODbegbie wrote:
> rules/60_whitelist.cf in CVS includes the line:
>
> whitelist_from *@yahoo-inc.com
>
> It's a site-wide default.
That's a general problem with wildcard (and auto) whitelists:
Only because it's a legitimate mailing list doesn't mean
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Craig Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "satalk"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:34 PM
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem
>
>
>
Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:56 AM
> > To: Craig Hughes; satalk
> > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem
>
"satalk"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 12:34 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem
> I finally found the whitelist_from entry in the sitewide
> /usr/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist.cf file (didn't know that it
existed).
> For some
]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:56 AM
> To: Craig Hughes; satalk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] USER_IN_WHITELIST problem
>
>
> Here are my whitelist_from entries in my /etc/mail/spamassassi
rules/60_whitelist.cf in CVS includes the line:
whitelist_from *@yahoo-inc.com
It's a site-wide default.
rOD.
--
I think I'm in love.
Probably just hungry.
- Original Message -
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "satalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday,
*@diamondwebdesigns.com
whitelist_from *@elijahlist.com
whitelist_from *.echampions2000.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:42 AM
> To: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] US
20 matches
Mail list logo
