At Wed Oct 30 18:37:32 2002, Jan Korger wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Tim Helton wrote:
>
> > score USER_AGENT_OE -0.3
> > score USER_AGENT_MUTT-4.109
> > score USER_AGENT -1.143
> >
> >
> > Maybe it would be beneficial to see if more than 1
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:49:26PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Another simple rule would be to detect emails which have both an X-Mailer
> and a User-Agents header. The OE rule actually detects an X-Mailer header,
> so the mail you got would have had to have both headers.
FYI: we've been workin
I wrote:
Another aspect of this flaw is the heavy positive weights posessed by some
mailers. This is easily added to a spam mail for bonus points, so I tend
to view any USER_AGENT rule with a score less than -2 as being highly
questionable, making an easy target for spam white listing.
To fur
Another simple rule would be to detect emails which have both an X-Mailer
and a User-Agents header. The OE rule actually detects an X-Mailer header,
so the mail you got would have had to have both headers.
I did a casual search of my emails and didn't find any (spam or nonspam)
with both, so th
