On Sun, 2002-02-17 at 22:02, Craig Hughes wrote:
> For the envelope TO, there seem to be 2 "standards", depending on when
> the info is added to the message header. One is added on SMTP-reception
> (such as with exim I think), in which case the header used is
> "Envelope-To".
Actually any head
On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 03:51:05PM -0700, Charlie Watts wrote:
>
> So ... perhaps we should support both. Envelope-To (which can have
> multiple addresses in it, remember) for folks who can use it, and
> Delivered-To for folks who can't. Simple enough.
>
> The nice thing about doing it with head
On 17 Feb 2002, Craig Hughes wrote:
> So, for envelope from checking, we should use the "Return-Path" header.
> I'll make a rule which compares Return-Path to From: and see how it does
> at differentiating spam from nonspam.
Hadn't even thought of checking the sender - interesting. I'm curious t
Ok, I did a little bit of searching:
For the envelope FROM, RFC-1123 specifies that the mail server making
"final delivery" of a message:
MUST pass the MAIL FROM: address from the SMTP envelope
with the message, for use if an error notification message must
be
