> I've read all three of your posts.. and don't have any suggestions to help
> you.. it looks like a bug to me.
OK, I've opened bug #2734 on it...
> What really makes me wonder is why the ip=none entry exists at all.
>
> Have you been doing something like spamassassin --add-addr-to-whitelist?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Santerre writes:
>I'm going to take a wild stab at this, but the AWL is NOT IP specific. It
>only goes by the from, not IP. I think it takes the "average" (I know it
>isn't an average.) score from all the records it has of it.
No, it *is* IP s
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:06:06PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Have you been doing something like spamassassin --add-addr-to-whitelist?
> In that case.. don't, because it appears that the no-ip entry added by this
> command will over-ride any and all IP address specific entries.
At least the l
At 04:26 PM 11/4/2003, Jay Levitt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jay Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: Second request: AWL false hits
> Hi.. does anyone have any ideas on this? I have read the FAQ, and thi
I'm going to take a wild stab at this, but the AWL is NOT IP specific. It
only goes by the from, not IP. I think it takes the "average" (I know it
isn't an average.) score from all the records it has of it.
Make sense?
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Jay Levitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
