Re: [SAtalk] Spammers trying to adapt..

2002-03-03 Thread Gunter Ohrner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Saturday, 2. March 2002 23:32 schrieb Daniel Quinlan: > > I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I > > suspect it's not working right though. > Why not strip out all non-letters and then do matching for things like > the "remov

Re: [SAtalk] Spammers trying to adapt..

2002-03-02 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Craig R Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I > suspect it's not working right though. Why not strip out all non-letters and then do matching for things like the "remove" rules? take this: +++

Re: [SAtalk] Spammers trying to adapt..

2002-03-02 Thread Craig R Hughes
I think the idea with GAPPY_TEXT is to catch these things. I suspect it's not working right though. C Martin Bene wrote: > Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 14:22:40 +0100 > From: Martin Bene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Spammers trying to adapt.. > > Hi, > > spammers

Re: [SAtalk] Spammers trying to adapt..

2002-03-02 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
> (none of the "remove" rules triggered) True, but gappy text should have been triggered. Maybe we need a gappy remove-specific test, because there's a lot of nonspam gappy text out there Regards, Andrew ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PRO