Re: [SAtalk] Spamd/razor problems

2002-10-18 Thread Mike Burger
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, local.spamassassin wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:58:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike > Burger) wrote: > > >The answer to this question is in the SA FAQ at www.spamassassin.org > > Damn! Sorry, I normally do look in places like that first. No problem. I'm just glad that

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd/razor problems

2002-10-18 Thread local.spamassassin
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:58:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Burger) wrote: >The answer to this question is in the SA FAQ at www.spamassassin.org Damn! Sorry, I normally do look in places like that first. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd/razor problems

2002-10-17 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 08:57:39AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: > The answer to this question is in the SA FAQ at www.spamassassin.org Upgrading to Razor 2.20 should fix that error as well. (still look at the FAQ anyway since it explains why you may want to use that solution for other reasons...) -

Re: [SAtalk] Spamd/razor problems

2002-10-17 Thread Mike Burger
The answer to this question is in the SA FAQ at www.spamassassin.org On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, local.spamassassin wrote: > I'm getting this whenever spamd is launched and > also whenever it gets accessed via spamc: > > >Oct 17 10:32:09 highland spamd[7979]: razor2 check skipped: Permission > denied C