At 1/15/2004 06:04 PM +0100, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
>> The last line is the new one, and it escapes any % signs in the
>> Message-ID. I don't use spamd so I can't confirm this to be the case,
>> but seems likely as I think it also uses Sys::Syslog.
>
>That shouldn't matter as spamd uses
> syslog
At 1/12/2004 02:47 PM -0500, Mick Szucs wrote:
>A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
>in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other mail
>processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high volume of
>control characters in t
On January 13, 2004 01:34 pm, Chadwick L. Sorrell wrote:
> > A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was
> > logged in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/maillog (like all other
> > mail processed by spamd.) The message in question contained a high
> > volume of cont
> Hi all,
>
> I did check the archives for the answer to this one, but the keywords involved
> are vague enough that it may have been answered and I couldn't find it.
>
> A message arrived the other day that when it was processed by spamd was logged
> in /var/log/messages instead of /var/log/m
