What did you do, if you don't mind me asking? I'm sure some of my
hacks have been uglier than yours :)
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:14:27AM -0500, Jim Holmes wrote:
> It works that way for me too. I'm not sure why. The hack that I did they
> showed up in the body of the message, but it was an ugl
It works that way for me too. I'm not sure why. The hack that I did they
showed up in the body of the message, but it was an ugly hack job.
-jlh
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 9:16 AM -0600 Dennis Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried this the other night, but the SPAM: reporting lines alw
I tried this the other night, but the SPAM: reporting lines always
ended up in the headers instead of the body. It doesn't do this
if I use Procmail or MailAudit for delivery instead. Is this
normal?
Sorry, I just started using SpamAssassin a couple days ago.
Thanks,
Denny
On Fri, Mar 15, 2
--On Friday, March 15, 2002 7:12 PM +0800 Jason Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
> all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
> Exchange).
Jason,
Take a look at spamproxyd in the spamas
> I want to use Spamassassin on our Postfix bastion mail host to filter
> all mail before it's relayed to our MAILSweeper (which then forwards to
> Exchange).
I use the content filtering facility in Postfix.
I get Postfix to call procmail as the content filter and then use
procmail to call sp
