On 3/11/02 4:53 AM, "Michael Moncur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Sergeant wrote:
>> I would suggest that we be extremely careful about checks that get given
>> a score over 5. Part of the beauty of SpamAssassin (and heuristics in
>> general) is that usually a hit just contributes to the ove
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I would suggest that we be extremely careful about checks that get given
> a score over 5. Part of the beauty of SpamAssassin (and heuristics in
> general) is that usually a hit just contributes to the overall score, but
> doesn't necessarily tip things over. Having said tha
