Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.21 nightly body rule compile fail

2002-05-27 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Marc MERLIN wrote: > So, to make sure I understand the build and version release, the 2.21 > that I downloaded a couple of hours ago: isn't it a build from CVS as > of last night, as announced on the web page? AFAIK, it is a build from CVS. > (or is it just that your fix h

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.21 nightly body rule compile fail

2002-05-27 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 08:22:32PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Mon, 27 May 2002, Marc MERLIN wrote: > > > This rule was apparently missing the trailing ')' > > The missing paren doesn't belong at the end, unfortunately. > > See bugzilla.spamassassin.org #351. Indeed, thanks. So, to ma

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.21 nightly body rule compile fail

2002-05-27 Thread Bart Schaefer
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Marc MERLIN wrote: > This rule was apparently missing the trailing ')' The missing paren doesn't belong at the end, unfortunately. See bugzilla.spamassassin.org #351. ___ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Applic