RE: [SAtalk] Rule Help...

2003-12-23 Thread Lucas Albers
>> At 02:50 PM 12/12/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: >> >Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around. I >> >can't get this to trigger a hit in SA. I have linted my >> >rules and my config files are being loaded properly. Dan, Can you post your rule? I would like to see what you

RE: [SAtalk] Rule Help...

2003-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 05:10 PM 12/12/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: Hi Matt, I created in a custom .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin Dan Hmm, then that should work correctly... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or

RE: [SAtalk] Rule Help...

2003-12-12 Thread Dan Tappin
Hi Matt, I created in a custom .cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt > Kettler > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 1:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subje

Re: [SAtalk] Rule Help...

2003-12-12 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:50 PM 12/12/2003, Dan Tappin wrote: Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around. I can't get this to trigger a hit in SA. I have linted my rules and my config files are being loaded properly. Which configfile did you add your rule to? local.cf or user_prefs? Do you

Re: [SAtalk] Rule Help...

2003-12-12 Thread Fred
Dan Tappin wrote: > Here is a custom rule for a PayPal spoof virus that is going around. I missed that one, try this out, they work for all previous scams I've seen. header __RCVD_PAYPAL Received =~ /paypal\.com/i header __FROM_PAYPAL From =~ /paypal\.com/i uri __URI_PAYPAL /paypal\.com/i head

RE: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread Chris Thielen
Right, you can make an entire word optional by "grouping" it (enclosing it in parentheses) and marking the group as optional by tacking a question mark on the end. In your case (a single character) it is better to use one of the other examples where you mark either a character class that only matc

RE: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread ian douglas
> did you mean: > rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: )?see/i > Better yet: > rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to[ ]?see/i > or even: > rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i Ah, didn't know I needed a trailing ? after the set of parentheses, I thought the syntax was only

Re: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread Fred I-IS.COM
Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ 810-794-4400 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Try this: rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i ? means 0 or 1 of the previous So the previous space can appear 0 or 1 times ;) ian douglas wrote: > My rul

Re: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread Scott Lambert
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:42:25PM -0800, ian douglas wrote: > My rule definition: > > rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: ) see/i > rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i -- Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread guenther
> rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: ) see/i > > > I want this to catch "prefer not to see" and "prefer not tosee" but the > (?: ) doesn't seem to catch whether the space exists or not. rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i You simply want an optional space... ...guenther

Re: [SAtalk] rule help please

2003-11-20 Thread Chris Thielen
Ian, did you mean: rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: )?see/i Better yet: rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to[ ]?see/i or even: rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam phrases: http://www.sandgn

Re: [SAtalk] Rule Help Needed

2003-09-02 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
well, that will match that string in the body.. but it should also match not having an attachment to return true. On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 01:39 PM, Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message- From: Jonathan Vanasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:1

RE: [SAtalk] Rule Help Needed

2003-09-02 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Vanasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 1:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Rule Help Needed > > > > variant on sobig rules, > > I'd like to have a rule for messages without attachments, if > their bo