Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...

Lukreme wrote: On 10 Nov 2003, at 07:33, Terry Milnes wrote: The typical user is capable of making toast in his electric toaster, but when it comes to the overwhelming complexities involved in operating a computer he is totally lost. He will become extremely agitated when he looses the *REALLY

Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...

Lukreme wrote: On 08 Nov 2003, at 06:46, Terry Milnes wrote: Some of us though are system administrators and need a solution to offer to the end users. The typical end user wants to open their email and see no spam, period. Since the definition of spam varies from person to person that is sim

RE: [SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...

Sorry about that. Try adding an l: http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.html - dan -- Dan Kohn -Original Message- From: Lukreme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 19:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subje

Re: [SAtalk] Re: scoring system and values...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lukreme writes: >Now, for your purposes, subjects with [word blacklisted by stupid list >server] might be exclusively spam. They might not be exclusively spam >for others. That's why you can override any score in your own cf file. > If you want