On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Bob Proulx stated:
>> My publication is double-opted in by 15,000 families with children with
>> autism.
... but not by mine, nor will it be. I prefer to read newsletters
written by people who reasearch before they sound off.
> Statements such as that during an introduction o
> > Start SpamAssassin results
> > 7.10 points, 5.5 required;
>
> > * 3.0 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 99 to 100%
> > [score: 0.9988]
Also -- isn't a 3.0 for 99-100% indicative of an OLD version of
SpamAssassin ?
===
Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This simple grep won't find variously encoded forms for "young adult", but
> I did try the base64 forms of "young adult" and "Young adult" and saw zero
> hits.
>
> I'm sure who ever came up with that pattern in the first place had a good
> reason
> at the t
> From: JRiley
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 9:43 PM
>
[...]
> >
> > The offending sentence is "We are an online discussion group in
> > GA for parents and caregivers of children and young adults with
> > disabilities." Sounds really pornographic, doesn't it?
[...]
>
> There are several othe
9 to 100%
> [score: 0.9988]
> * 0.2 -- BODY: HTML contains unsafe auto-executing code
> * 2.9 -- BODY: HTML has very strong "shouting" markup
> * 0.4 -- URI: Uses %-escapes inside a URL's hostname
> * 0.7 -- URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email addres
Bob George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Beamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...] (I particularly like seeing the "* 0.5 -- BODY: Possible porn - Hot,
> > Nasty, Wild, Young" rating on a children's autism mailing list...)
>
> Having read through the web page (apparently the email was the S
> Yep. I googled him and he's the father of an autistic child who is very
> active in promoting awareness and research. Easy to see where the
> hyperdrive comes from. Still... mix in a compassion sandwich in other
> areas of your life will ya, Len!? ;) I know... not here, quake
> server, etc
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob George
> Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 4:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: False positives
>
> John Beamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [...] (I particularly
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
SM> [moved from Razor-users mailing list]:
SM> On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 11:36, Craig R Hughes wrote:
SM> > Is the problem that you're seeing "real" email generating scores in
SM> > excess of 30 in SA, or that people are ignoring the warning and
SM> > reducing the threshold su
