RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-06 Thread Scott Harris
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chris Santerre > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM > To: 'Chris Barnes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-06 Thread Scott Harris
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Chris Santerre > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM > To: 'Chris Barnes'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Blaise
> Just to be different, I use joe -- an editor that uses the > WordStar keys. My fingers were trained on WordStar in > non-document mode long ago. We reach, brother. I use Jed in WordStar mode. I was imprinted on the WordStar command set with Semware's Qedit and later The Semwa

Re: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Christopher X. Candreva
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Chris Petersen wrote: > > I'm too embarrassed to tell people I use pico... > > I was trying to avoid the editor-war, but I have to say that I'm right > there with you (though when I can, I use nano because it has a few more Just to be different, I use joe -- an editor that use

Re: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Bob Amen
Chris Thielen wrote: Chris Santerre said: vi != Very Intuitive C'mon now... what could be more intuitive than j for move down, l for right, "*yy for copy to clipboard, gg for move to top of file? Are you just kidding? ;) Actually it was very intuitive back in the old days when the arrow keys w

Re: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Petersen
> I'm too embarrassed to tell people I use pico... I was trying to avoid the editor-war, but I have to say that I'm right there with you (though when I can, I use nano because it has a few more features but still keeps the nice EASY TO USE interface). Then again, when I really want to code, I u

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Santerre
OK I have issues: > -Original Message- > From: Mark Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:59 PM > To: Mark Muller; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS > >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Larry Rosenman
D]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS Bigevil just took a poke at a legit ticketmaster confirmation email, hit on 3 rules: 70, 82 and 150. I'm tracking down the specific URLS, one is entertainment.com :( -Original Message- From: Chris Thielen

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Santerre
k Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:51 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS > > > Bigevil just took a poke at a legit ticketmaster confirmation > email, hit on >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Mark Muller
than removing akmaitech :P I hate those guys. But obviously Chris wanted *zero* false positives, and this is one. -Original Message- From: Mark Muller Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:51 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Mark Muller
EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS Chris Santerre said: >> -Original Message- >> From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> mikea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Ah! The editor wars begin anew! >> > >> >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Thielen
Chris Santerre said: >> -Original Message- >> From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> mikea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Ah! The editor wars begin anew! >> > >> > I'll just go start some popcorn. >> > >> > As for me, I don't open my eggs on the big _or_ the little end. >> > >> >

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-04 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS > > > mikea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah! The editor wars begin anew! > > > > I'll just go sta

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Santerre
And just like that, we are at ver1.56 :) All fixed. You had told me this in the past, and it was fixed in evilrules. The problem is that when I made Bigevil, I used the list files used to create the old evilrules. Not the old evilrules themselves. So this was still in the list. Thanks for the fin

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-03 Thread Vee Persaud
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:53 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS >> >> >> Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Now to see if the

RE: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-03 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Re: BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS > > > Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now to see if the payment terms mean that I can w